CLINE VS CURSOR VS WINDSURF: BEST AI CODING AGENT COMPARISON 2025

1. Introduction

The shift towards Agentic Development (Cline vs Cursor vs Windsurf)

The software development industry stands at a precipice(A very steep cliff)  in 2025, marking a definitive transition from the era of “AI-Assisted” coding to the age of “AI-Autonomous” development. For the past three years, the dominant paradigm was defined by the “Copilot” model a system predicated on stochastic next-token prediction, effectively serving as a highly advanced autocomplete engine. While revolutionary, this model kept the cognitive load firmly on the human developer, who was required to orchestrate the AI’s suggestions, manage context manually, and bridge the gap between intent and implementation.

The emergence of Cline, Cursor, and Windsurf represents a fundamental architectural shift toward “Agentic” workflows. These tools are not merely predicting text; they are predicting and executing actions. They possess the capability to perceive their environment (read file systems, analyze directory structures, interpret terminal outputs), reason about the state of a project, formulate multi-step plans, and execute those plans with varying degrees of autonomy.¹ This report provides an exhaustive, expert-level analysis of these three platforms, dissecting their architectural decisions, economic models, user experiences, and suitability for the disparate needs of the modern software engineering landscape.

1.1 The Definition of “Agency” in Modern Development

To understand the divergence between these tools, one must first establish a rigorous definition of “Agency” within the context of software engineering in 2025. Unlike the chatbots of 2023, which operated in a vacuum of text-in/text-out, the agents of 2025 function as loops. The “loop” mechanism, comprising Perception, Reasoning, Action, and Observation, is the defining characteristic that separates a tool like Cline from a standard Copilot extension.³

• Perception: The ability to ingest not just code, but the context of the code, file structures, linter errors, terminal output, and even visual rendering in a browser.
• Reasoning: The capacity to maintain a “chain of thought,” planning a sequence of modifications across multiple files to achieve a high-level goal (e.g., “Refactor the authentication middleware to use Supabase”).
• Action: The privilege to execute shell commands, create files, delete directories, and modify code without explicit per-keystroke approval.
• Observation: The critical ability to read the result of an action (e.g., a failed build error) and self-correct without human intervention.

As the analysis will demonstrate, Cline (and its fork Roo Code) prioritizes this loop above all else, positioning itself as an autonomous employee. Cursor and Windsurf, by contrast, have historically prioritized the “Perception” and “Action” phases to enhance the speed of the human developer, creating a “Cyborg” model of development where human and AI act as a singular, high-velocity unit.⁵

1.2 The Market Landscape: A Tripartite Struggle (CLINE VS CURSOR VS WINDSURF)

The market has bifurcated into two distinct architectural philosophies:

1. The Native IDE Fork: Represented by Cursor and Windsurf, this approach argues that for AI to be truly effective, it must own the entire Integrated Development Environment (IDE). By forking Microsoft’s Visual Studio Code (VS Code), these vendors can modify the rendering engine, the file system listeners, and the terminal integration at a native level, enabling features like “Shadow Workspaces” and zero-latency predictive text.⁷
2. The Agnostic Extension: Represented by Cline, this approach argues for modularity and privacy. By operating as a VS Code extension, Cline allows developers to retain their existing environments, themes, and keybindings, while injecting agentic capabilities via standard APIs. This model aligns with the “Bring Your Own Key” (BYOK) economic model, appealing to power users and privacy-hardened enterprises.⁹

The following sections will deconstruct these tools with unprecedented granularity, beginning with the architectural foundations that dictate their capabilities.

2. Architectural Deep Dive: The Fork vs. The Extension

The choice between a native fork (Cursor, Windsurf) and an extension (Cline) is not merely a matter of installation convenience; it determines the fundamental ceiling of the tool’s capabilities, its performance profile, and its integration depth.

2.1 Cursor: The Shadow Workspace and Speculative Execution

Cursor, essentially a distinct product built on top of VS Code, leverages its control over the editor’s core to implement what is arguably its most significant technical differentiator: the Shadow Workspace (often referred to in their technical blogs as speculative execution or “fast apply”).

In a standard editor, the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) is updated only when the user types. Cursor, however, maintains a parallel understanding of the codebase. When a user is typing, Cursor’s local models (and cloud models) are running speculative inference, predicting not just the next token, but the next diff. This allows for the “Tab-Tab-Tab” workflow where the AI predicts a change, the user accepts it, and the AI immediately predicts the cursor’s jump to the next relevant line.¹¹

This architecture requires deep modifications to the editor’s event loop. A standard extension cannot achieve this because the VS Code Extension Host API introduces a serialization/deserialization latency (often 50-100ms) between the extension and the renderer. Cursor bypasses this, allowing for “ghost text” that feels instantaneous. Furthermore, Cursor’s Composer feature (formerly “Agent”) runs in a separate window that can “float” over the editor, maintaining a persistent context that is aware of the user’s viewport, selection, and even recent file history, independent of the standard VS Code context limitations.⁶

Implication for the User: The user experiences a “fluid” coding state where the AI feels like an extension of their own nervous system. However, the trade-off is “Vendor Lock-in.” Migrating to Cursor requires abandoning the standard VS Code update cycle and relying on the Cursor team to merge upstream changes from Microsoft.

2.2 Windsurf: The Context Engine and “Cascade” Flow

Windsurf, developed by Codeium, also forks VS Code but approaches the architecture with a different priority: Deep Context Awareness. While Cursor focuses on the speed of the edit, Windsurf focuses on the correctness of the context.⁵

Windsurf’s architecture is built around Cascade, a flow-state engine that integrates “Memories” and “Rules” directly into the IDE’s file system watchers. Unlike standard RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) which simply chunks and indexes text, Windsurf’s engine claims to understand the topology of the project—the relationship between files, the import graph, and the build pipeline.¹²

Crucially, Windsurf’s architecture enables Real-Time Terminal Awareness. Standard VS Code extensions can read terminal output, but usually only after a command has finished or via polling. Windsurf’s fork integrates the terminal as a first-class data stream for the AI. If a command fails, the “Cascade” engine perceives the error code and the stack trace immediately, prompting the user with a “Fix this” option that is contextually aware of the command that was just run.¹³ This tight coupling between the terminal process and the editor process is a direct result of the forked architecture.

2.3 Cline: The Client-Side Sovereign via MCP

Cline (and its popular fork, Roo Code) rejects the “Fork” philosophy. It operates as a VS Code extension, which imposes strict limitations: it cannot modify the editor’s rendering engine, it cannot implement zero-latency ghost text (tab completion) as effectively as a native tool, and it is bound by the Extension Host’s resource limits.⁹

However, Cline turns this limitation into a massive architectural advantage through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). MCP is an open standard that allows the AI agent to interface with external systems, PostgreSQL databases, Slack workspaces, GitHub repositories, and local file systems, through a standardized API. Because Cline acts as an “orchestrator” rather than just an editor feature, it can mount these MCP servers as tools.¹⁴

The Autonomous Loop Architecture:

Cline’s architecture is defined by its recursive execution loop:

1. Thinking: The LLM generates a chain of thought based on the user prompt and current context.
2. Tool Use: The LLM emits a tool use block (e.g., execute_command, read_file, write_to_file).
3. Execution: The Cline extension executes this tool on the user’s machine (Client-Side Execution).
4. Observation: The output of the tool (e.g., terminal stdout, file content) is fed back into the context window.
5. Recursion: The LLM analyzes the output and decides the next step.

This architecture makes Cline significantly more powerful for Asynchronous Tasks. A user can tell Cline to “Update the dependencies, run the tests, fix any errors, and commit the changes,” and Cline will cycle through this loop 50 or 100 times if necessary.⁴ Neither Cursor nor Windsurf (in their default modes) are architected for this level of sustained, autonomous looping without human “checkpoints.”

3. Detailed Tool Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, and User Experience

Having established the architectural differentiation, we now examine each tool’s specific implementation, user experience, and feature set.

3.1 Cursor: The “Power User” Precision Instrument

Philosophy: Cursor treats AI as a force multiplier for the expert developer. Its UI is dense, feature-rich, and unapologetically complex, catering to those who want granular control over the AI’s interaction with their code.¹³

Key Feature: Tab Prediction (Copilot++):

Cursor’s “Tab” feature is the gold standard for autocomplete. It uses a custom model (separate from the chat model) trained for low-latency next-edit prediction. It can predict multi-line changes and even cursor movements.

• Insight: This feature is the primary “hook” that keeps developers on Cursor. Once a developer adapts to the rhythm of hitting Tab to accept a refactor that spans 10 lines, going back to standard Copilot feels sluggish.

Key Feature: Composer (Agent Mode):

The Composer is Cursor’s answer to agentic workflows. It allows users to open a floating window (Cmd+I or Cmd+L) that can edit multiple files simultaneously.

• The “Kitchen Sink” Problem: Users have noted that Cursor’s UI can become cluttered. There are “bubbles,” inline diffs, chat panes, and composer windows. For a new user, this “kitchen sink” approach is overwhelming, leading to a steep learning curve.⁶
• Control: Cursor provides features like “Checkpoints” which allow users to scrub back through the AI’s changes—a critical safety net when the agent inevitably hallucinates or deletes code.¹⁵

Privacy and Security:

Cursor offers a “Privacy Mode” where code is not stored on their servers. However, because it is a SaaS product, the code must transit their servers (or the underlying LLM provider’s servers) for inference, unless the user relies strictly on local models (which are significantly less capable). This transit creates a compliance friction point for highly regulated industries.16

3.2 Windsurf: The “Flow State” Facilitator

Philosophy: Windsurf, by Codeium, positions itself as the “Apple” to Cursor’s “Android/Windows.” It prioritizes smoothness, minimalism, and the abstraction of complexity.⁶

Key Feature: Cascade:

Cascade is Windsurf’s agentic engine. Unlike Cursor’s Composer, which feels like a separate tool, Cascade is integrated into the flow of the IDE.

• Deep Context: Cascade is renowned for its “Memories” feature—it remembers architectural decisions made in previous sessions (e.g., “We are using Tailwind, not CSS modules”) without the user needing to constantly reprompt.¹²
• The “Vibe Coding” Haven: Windsurf has captured the “Vibe Coding” market—users who may not be expert coders but want to build products by describing them. The UI suppresses the terrifying “wall of red diffs” that Cursor shows, instead presenting a cleaner, high-level summary of changes.¹⁷

Key Feature: Terminal “Turbo” Mode:

Windsurf’s terminal integration is superior to Cursor’s. It allows for “Turbo” mode, where the AI can execute a sequence of terminal commands (install packages, run servers, migrate databases) with a single approval. This makes it ideal for “Greenfield” projects (setting up a new app from scratch).18

Pricing Aggression:

Windsurf has aggressively undercut Cursor, offering a Pro plan at $15/month compared to Cursor’s $20/month. This 25% price difference, combined with a perceived “unlimited” usage model for their proprietary models (SWE-1), makes it highly attractive for cost-sensitive individual developers and students.19

3.3 Cline (and Roo Code): The Open Source Autonomous Agent

Philosophy: Cline is the tool for the developer who wants ownership. Ownership of the model, ownership of the API key, and ownership of the execution environment. It is less of a “coding assistant” and more of a “digital employee”.²⁰

Key Feature: Model Agnosticism (BYOK):

Cline does not resell models. The user provides their own API key (Anthropic, OpenAI, DeepSeek, OpenRouter).

• The DeepSeek V3/R1 Revolution: The release of DeepSeek V3 (and the reasoning model R1) has been a massive tailwind for Cline. Because these models are incredibly cheap (approx $0.50/million input tokens) and highly capable, Cline users can run massive, 100-step agentic loops for pennies. In contrast, running similar loops on Cursor (which may use Claude 3.5 Sonnet under the hood) is expensive for the vendor, leading to rate limits.²¹

Key Feature: The “Roo Code” Fork:

The open-source nature of Cline has led to a vibrant ecosystem. Roo Code is a prominent fork that introduces “Personalities.”

• Personalities: Users can switch Roo Code between different modes: a “Code Architect” (high reasoning, no coding), a “QA Engineer” (writes tests, runs them), or a “Security Auditor” (scans for vulnerabilities). This specialization mimics a real software team.⁸
• Boomerang Mode: Roo Code’s “Boomerang” feature allows the user to give a prompt and then walk away. The agent will work, and if it gets stuck, it will pause. If it succeeds, it waits for review. This asynchronous workflow is unique to the Cline ecosystem.²²

The Trust Barrier:

Because Cline shows every step it takes (reading file X, running command Y), it builds a higher degree of trust. The user sees the “thought process.” In contrast, Cursor and Windsurf often just “do it,” which can be disconcerting when the AI makes a mistake. However, this transparency comes at the cost of speed—watching Cline “think” is slower than Cursor’s instantaneous “Tab”.11

4. Comparative Analysis: Head-to-Head Battle Scenarios

To provide a nuanced recommendation, we must evaluate these tools not in a vacuum, but in specific, high-stakes scenarios typical of professional software engineering.

Scenario A: The Legacy Refactor (The “Spaghetti” Challenge)

Context: A developer needs to refactor a 5-year-old monolithic Node.js application, splitting a massive utils.js file (3,000 lines) into modular services.

• Cursor: Performs well initially due to its local indexing. However, users report that for files exceeding 1,000 lines, Cursor’s context window management can become “lossy,” leading to hallucinations where it references code that was just deleted. The “Composer” may get stuck in a loop trying to apply a diff to a file that has changed too drastically.²³
• Windsurf: The “Cascade” engine struggles with deep legacy code if the “Rules” are not explicitly set. Users have reported that Windsurf sometimes produces “simpler” or “nonsensical” code when faced with high complexity, likely due to optimization for speed/latency over exhaustive context loading.¹⁵
• Cline: WINNER. Cline excels here because it reads the entire file content into the context window before making a decision (assuming a model with a large context window like Gemini 1.5 Pro or Claude 3.5 Sonnet is used). Its step-by-step approach allows it to:

1. Create the new directory structure.
2. Read the big file.
3. Extract Function A to File A.
4. Verify File A exists.
5. Update imports in the main file.
6. Run the linter to ensure no breakage.
   This slow, methodical process prevents the “Death Loops” common in faster tools.4

Scenario B: Greenfield Development (The “Startup” Sprint)

Context: A Product Manager wants to build a React Native MVP for a “Dog Walking Uber” app from scratch.

• Cursor: Powerful, but the UI complexity (diffs, terminal commands, multiple panes) acts as friction. The user needs to know what to ask and where to click.
• Cline: Too verbose. The setup (API keys, model selection) is a barrier to entry. The constant “Requesting permission to run command…” (unless configured otherwise) breaks the creative flow.
• Windsurf: WINNER. The “Vibe Coding” capabilities are unmatched. The user can drag and drop a screenshot of a UI design, and Windsurf’s Cascade will generate the code, install dependencies, and run the preview. The “Turbo” mode handles the terminal setup (installing Expo, React Native, etc.) seamlessly. The “Apple-like” UI keeps the focus on the product, not the code.¹³

Scenario C: The Enterprise Security Audit

Context: A banking client requires an AI tool that ensures no code snippet is ever trained on, and all AI traffic is logged and auditable.

• Cursor/Windsurf: Both offer “Enterprise” plans with Zero Data Retention (ZDR). However, the code still leaves the premise. Trust is placed in the vendor’s legal agreement.
• Cline: WINNER. With Cline, the enterprise can configure the tool to point to a Local LLM (e.g., Llama 3 running on an internal GPU cluster) or a private Azure OpenAI instance. The code never touches a third-party SaaS provider’s infrastructure. The “Client-Side” execution means the security team can audit exactly what the extension is doing on the developer’s machine.²⁵

5. The Economics of AI Development: SaaS vs. Utility

The economic divergence between these tools is as significant as the technical one.

5.1 The SaaS Model (Cursor & Windsurf)

This model offers predictability.

• Windsurf: $15/month (Individual), $30/month (Team).
• Cursor: $20/month (Individual), $40/month (Team).

Hidden Costs & Limits:

Both tools market “Unlimited” usage, but this is asterisked.

• Cursor: 500 “Fast” premium requests (Claude 3.5 Sonnet/GPT-4o). After that, you are downgraded to a “Slow” pool or less capable models. For a power user working 8 hours a day, 500 requests can be consumed in one week.¹⁹
• Windsurf: Uses a confusing “Flow Action Credits” system. While the base price is lower ($15), heavy agentic use (which consumes more compute than chat) can drain the “Fast” bucket quickly.⁶

5.2 The Utility Model (Cline/Roo Code)

This model offers transparency and scalability, but volatility.

• Cost Structure: User pays the LLM provider directly.
• The “Sonnet Shock”: Using Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet for everything is expensive. A complex refactor reading massive files can cost $2.00 in a single session. Users report spending $20–$50 per month easily, sometimes exceeding the cost of a Cursor subscription.²⁰
• The “DeepSeek” Disruption: The introduction of DeepSeek V3 (comparable to Claude 3.5 Sonnet) at ~1/10th the price changes the math. A Cline user routing standard tasks to DeepSeek and complex tasks to Claude can achieve a blended cost of ~$5-$10/month for heavy usage, significantly cheaper than Cursor/Windsurf.²¹
• Cost Control: Cline calculates the cost of a request before sending it (listing token count and estimated price), empowering the developer to make economic decisions (“Do I really need the expensive model for this typo fix?”).²⁸

Table 1: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Comparison

User Profile	Cursor (SaaS)	Windsurf (SaaS)	Cline + DeepSeek (Utility)	Cline + Claude (Utility)
Hobbyist (5 hrs/week)	Free (Limited)	Free (Limited)	< $1.00/mo	~$5.00/mo
Pro Developer (40 hrs/week)	$20.00/mo	$15.00/mo	~$8.00/mo	~$30.00–$50.00/mo
Power User (Agentic Loops)	$20.00 (throttled)	$15.00 (throttled)	~$15.00 (unthrottled)	$100.00+ (unthrottled)

Insight: The Utility model (Cline) penalizes inefficiency but rewards optimization. The SaaS model (Cursor/Windsurf) acts as insurance against high-volume usage but caps peak performance.

6. Security, Privacy, and Compliance

In 2025, the question “Where does my code go?” is paramount.

6.1 Data Retention and Training

• Cursor & Windsurf: Both companies explicitly state in their “Pro” and “Enterprise” terms that they do not train on user code. However, “Privacy Mode” implementation details are opaque. In Cursor, activating “Agent” features often requires sending file context to the cloud, even if retention is turned off. The “Shadow Workspace” relies on cloud compute for the heavy lifting in many configurations.¹⁶
• Cline: Offers absolute transparency. Because it is open-source, security researchers can (and have) audited the code to ensure no hidden telemetry transmits source code. The data path is strictly Local Machine -> API Provider. If the user selects an API provider with a zero-retention policy (e.g., AWS Bedrock or Azure OpenAI), the chain of custody is unbroken.²⁵

6.2 The “Air-Gapped” Developer

For defense contractors, financial institutions, and health tech, “Cloud AI” is often a non-starter.

• Cline is the only viable option. By configuring Cline to use Ollama or LM Studio running a model like Llama-3-70b-Instruct or Qwen-2.5-Coder locally, a developer can have a fully autonomous agent working on a machine with no internet access. Neither Cursor nor Windsurf supports this level of offline autonomy with their full feature set (Cascade/Composer require cloud orchestration).²⁸

7. Future Trends: The Trajectory of Coding

Analyzing the development velocity of these tools reveals the trajectory of the industry.

7.1 The Commoditization of the Editor

The intense competition between Cursor and Windsurf is commoditizing the “AI Editor.” Features that were unique to Cursor in 2024 (like “Tab” completion) are being replicated by Windsurf (SuperComplete) and even VS Code itself (Copilot Next). As the “Native AI” features become standard, the differentiation will shift to the Agent’s Logic.

7.2 Multi-Agent Swarms

The “Roo Code” fork of Cline foreshadows the future: Multi-Agent Systems. Instead of one generic “AI Assistant,” developers will employ a “Swarm”:

• Agent A (Architect): Plans the structure, creates the tickets.
• Agent B (Coder): Writes the implementation (using cheap models).
• Agent C (Reviewer): Reviews the code (using expensive, high-reasoning models).
• Agent D (Security): Attempts to exploit the code.
  Cline’s MCP architecture is uniquely positioned to facilitate this, as it allows different agents to hand off tasks via standardized protocols.8

7.3 The Death of the “Junior Dev” Task

All three tools effectively eliminate the drudgery typically assigned to junior developers: writing boilerplate, updating unit tests, and refactoring legacy syntax. The “Vibe Coding” phenomenon suggests a future where “Software Engineer” bifurcates into “Product Builder” (using Windsurf to generate apps) and “System Architect” (using Cline to manage the agents that build the infrastructure).¹⁷

8. Conclusion and Recommendations

The “Best” AI coding agent in 2025 is not a singular tool, but a choice of workflow philosophy. The market has moved beyond the one-size-fits-all Copilot.

8.1 Summary of Findings

• Cursor remains the champion of Developer Fluidity. Its “Tab” prediction and native integration make it the fastest tool for writing code line-by-line. It is the “Sports Car” of IDEs—fast, expensive, and precise.
• Windsurf has claimed the throne of Contextual Ease. Its “Cascade” flow and “Memories” reduce the cognitive load of managing state, making it the ideal tool for “Vibe Coding,” greenfield projects, and developers who value a polished, Apple-like experience. It is the “Self-Driving Sedan”—smooth, comfortable, and accessible.
• Cline (and Roo Code) is the Autonomous Heavy Lifter. It is not about speed; it is about capability and control. It is the only tool that allows for true “Agentic Loops,” model flexibility, and air-gapped security. It is the “Industrial Excavator”—powerful, manual, and capable of moving mountains if you know how to operate the levers.

8.2 Final Recommendations

For the Enterprise CTO:

Standardize on Windsurf Teams for the general developer population to maximize adoption and compliance ease. However, provide Cline (w/ Private API Keys) to your Principal Engineers and Security Architects who need to perform deep system surgery and audits without vendor opacity.

For the Solo Founder / Indie Hacker:

Adopt Windsurf. The $15/month price point and the ability to “Vibe Code” entire features allows for rapid prototyping and MVP shipping which is critical for survival.

For the Senior Staff Engineer:

Use a Hybrid Workflow. Use Cursor as your daily driver for its superior autocomplete and “Tab” workflow. But install the Cline extension inside Cursor. When you hit a task that requires touching 50 files or a complex refactor, open the Cline sidebar, switch to “Plan Mode,” and let the autonomous agent handle the grunt work while you supervise.24

For the Student / Learner:

Use Cline with DeepSeek. This forces you to understand the underlying mechanics (API keys, context windows) and provides the cheapest access to state-of-the-art intelligence, ensuring you learn how the AI thinks rather than just accepting its magic.

The era of the “10x Developer” is ending; the era of the “100x Agent Orchestrator” has begun. Choosing the right tool is the first step in that transformation.

Works cited

1. Cline vs. Windsurf vs. PearAI vs. Cursor: 2025’s Top AI Coding …, accessed November 27, 2025, https://medium.com/@pahwar/cline-vs-windsurf-vs-pearai-vs-cursor-2025s-top-ai-coding-assistants-compared-2b04b985df51
2. What are the best AI agent builders in 2025?, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LLMDevs/comments/1p6azf6/what_are_the_best_ai_agent_builders_in_2025/
3. 10 months into 2025, what’s the best AI agent tools you’ve found so far?, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AI_Agents/comments/1oc2oid/10_months_into_2025_whats_the_best_ai_agent_tools/
4. My workflow in using Cline to fix a bug in a non-trivial application – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1hugf4i/my_workflow_in_using_cline_to_fix_a_bug_in_a/
5. Cursor vs Windsurf vs Cline: Which AI Dev Tool Is Right for You? | UI Bakery Blog, accessed November 27, 2025, https://uibakery.io/blog/cursor-vs-windsurf-vs-cline
6. Windsurf vs Cursor: which is the better AI code editor? – Builder.io, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.builder.io/blog/windsurf-vs-cursor
7. Cursor vs Windsurf vs VS Code with Copilot: Where to Put Your Money – Medium, accessed November 27, 2025, https://medium.com/@shadetreeit/cursor-vs-windsurf-vs-vs-code-with-copilot-where-to-put-your-money-e381f9ae281e
8. Cline vs Roo Code vs Cursor – Better Stack, accessed November 27, 2025, https://betterstack.com/community/comparisons/cline-vs-roo-code-vs-cursor/
9. Best Cursor Alternatives for Developers with VS Code (2025) – Cline Blog, accessed November 27, 2025, https://cline.bot/blog/best-cursor-alternatives-for-developers-with-vs-code-2025
10. Cline – AI Coding, Open Source and Uncompromised, accessed November 27, 2025, https://cline.bot/
11. Cline vs Cursor: A Comparison With Examples – DataCamp, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/cline-vs-cursor
12. Windsurf – The best AI for Coding, accessed November 27, 2025, https://windsurf.com/
13. Windsurf vs. Cursor – which AI coding app is better? – Prompt Warrior, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.thepromptwarrior.com/p/windsurf-vs-cursor-which-ai-coding-app-is-better
14. AI Coding, Open Source and Uncompromised – Cline, accessed November 27, 2025, https://cline.bot/pricing
15. Cursor vs. Windsurf: Real-World Experience with Large Codebases – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1htlx48/cursor_vs_windsurf_realworld_experience_with/
16. cline vs cursor : r/CLine – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CLine/comments/1jlt61w/cline_vs_cursor/
17. Differences between Windsurf and cursor – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1o8oa26/differences_between_windsurf_and_cursor/
18. Windsurf vs. Cursor: Which AI coding tool should you use? [2025] – Zapier, accessed November 27, 2025, https://zapier.com/blog/windsurf-vs-cursor/
19. Windsurf vs Cursor | AI IDE Comparison, accessed November 27, 2025, https://windsurf.com/compare/windsurf-vs-cursor
20. Cline vs Cursor: Which AI Coding Tool Is Better? [2025] – Qodo, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.qodo.ai/blog/cline-vs-cursor/
21. Roo Code Vs Cursor Vs Windsurf Vs Cline – Help me choose : r/CLine – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CLine/comments/1j047j7/roo_code_vs_cursor_vs_windsurf_vs_cline_help_me/
22. Cursor vs RooCode – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/RooCode/comments/1k0sjvm/cursor_vs_roocode/
23. Easy Refactoring With Windsurf – No More Edit Errors! : r/Codeium – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Codeium/comments/1jj4bqf/easy_refactoring_with_windsurf_no_more_edit_errors/
24. My experience with Cursor vs Cline after 3 months of daily use : r/ChatGPTCoding – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1inyt2s/my_experience_with_cursor_vs_cline_after_3_months/
25. Cline vs Cursor: Which AI Coding Tool Is Right for You? – Prismetric, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.prismetric.com/cline-vs-cursor/
26. Torn Between Windsurf vs. Cursor? So Was I Until I Went All In – G2 Learning Hub, accessed November 27, 2025, https://learn.g2.com/windsurf-vs-cursor
27. Windsurf vs Cursor Pricing in 2025: Comprehensive Comparison for Tech Teams, accessed November 27, 2025, https://uibakery.io/blog/windsurf-vs-cursor-pricing
28. Cline – Visual Studio Marketplace, accessed November 27, 2025, https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=saoudrizwan.claude-dev

For those with experience: Cursor, Windsurf or Cline in VSCode? – Reddit, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1ioojwq/for_those_with_experience_cursor_windsurf_or/